AgJOBS in the 109th Congress (2005-2006)

Immigration Labor - AgJOBS History

In April 2005, a majority of the Senate voted in support of AgJOBS when it had an opportunity to consider AgJOBS as an amendment to a supplemental appropriations bill for the Iraq war, SA 375 to HR 1268. In May 2006, AgJOBS was included in the comprehensive immigration reform bill passed by the Senate, S. 2611 (the House leadership refused to consider the bill seriously). In contrast to the successes of AgJOBS, Senator Chambliss's attempts to pass one-sided reform of the H-2A agricultural guestworker program without giving farmworkers a chance to earn permanent immigration status failed repeatedly.

There were also some efforts to pass AgJOBS during the lame duck session. Although these efforts were unsuccessful, they demonstrated the commitment of Senators Feinstein and Craig to pass AgJOBS.

AgJOBS Sponsors in the 109th Congress

AgJOBS had 49 sponsors in the Senate and 57 sponsors in the House of Representatives  .

AgJOBS Debate in the 109th Congress

See this page to read summaries of the debates in 2005 and 2006.

Legislative Language for the 109th Congress

Summaries and Descriptions:

Alternatives to AgJOBSin the 109th

Here is some information about some of the alternative proposals to farmworker immigration policy that were presented in the 109th Congress.

In the Senate:

..and in the House:

Farmworkers and Comprehensive Immigration Reform in the 109th

For an overview of several of the main comprehensive immigration reform proposals and how they affect farmworkers, please see the links below:

September 30, 2005:Immigration Policy Brief No. 3  Contains articles on April 19, 2005 Senate vote on AgJOBS; summaries of the Kennedy-McCain comprehensive immigration bill  , Rep. Jackson Lee's bill  , and theCornyn-Kyl bill  .

February 9, 2006: Summary of Sen. Hagel (R.-Neb.) proposal for comprehensive immigration reform  .

September 5, 2006: Although the Hutchison-Pence immigration proposal  was hailed as a great compromise that could help bring about negotiations, it has not yet done so. Our attached analysis of the Hutchison-Pence proposal shows that it is unrealistic, unworkable, and bad for workers.

More information about the House immigration bill, HR 4437 (the Sensenbrenner bill).